Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Cryptography Security Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum Foundations

Single-state multiparty semiquantum secret sharing with d-dimensional Bell states

arXiv
Authors: Ying Chen, Zhi-Gang Gan, Tian-Yu Ye

Year

2022

Paper ID

59034

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

78

Citations

N/A

Abstract

A single-state multiparty semiquantum secret sharing (MSQSS) scheme with d-dimensional Bell states is proposed, which can accomplish the goal that only when all receivers work together can they restore the sender's secret key. This protocol is validated to be secure against both the outside attack and the participant attack. This protocol is adaptive for the d-dimensional system, only employs one kind of d-dimensional Bell states as initial quantum resource and needs neither quantum entanglement swapping nor unitary operations.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • A single-state multiparty semiquantum secret sharing (MSQSS) scheme with d-dimensional Bell states is proposed, which can accomplish the goal that only when all receivers work...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #59034 #78817 Modelling Josephson Junctions w... #78814 Construction of isoscattering n... #78811 Autonomous Code Migration for Q... #78808 Experimental generation of asym...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.