Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Reconstruction wedges in AdS/CFT with boundary fractallike structures
arXiv
Authors: Ning Bao, Joydeep Naskar
Year
2022
Paper ID
58813
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
101
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this work, we show the robustness of uberholography and its associated quantum error correcting code against the breakdown of entanglement wedge in the presence of highly entropic mixed states in the bulk. We show that for Cantor-set-like erasure in the boundary in AdS3/CFT2, the code distance is independent of the mixed-state entropy in the bulk in the m→infty limit. We also show that for a Sierpinski triangle shaped boundary subregion with fractal boundary erasures in AdS4/CFT3, bulk reconstruction is possible in the presence of highly entropic mixed states in the bulk in the large m regime.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this work, we show the robustness of uberholography and its associated quantum error correcting code against the breakdown of entanglement wedge in the presence of highly...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.