Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Efficient Quantum Agnostic Improper Learning of Decision Trees
arXiv
Authors: Sagnik Chatterjee, Tharrmashastha SAPV, Debajyoti Bera
Year
2022
Paper ID
58769
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
211
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The agnostic setting is the hardest generalization of the PAC model since it is akin to learning with adversarial noise. In this paper, we give a poly\(n,t,{frac{1}{varepsilon}}\) quantum algorithm for learning size t decision trees with uniform marginal over instances, in the agnostic setting, without membership queries. Our algorithm is the first algorithm (classical or quantum) for learning decision trees in polynomial time without membership queries. We show how to construct a quantum agnostic weak learner by designing a quantum version of the classical Goldreich-Levin algorithm that works with strongly biased function oracles. We show how to quantize the agnostic boosting algorithm by Kalai and Kanade (NIPS 2009) to obtain the first efficient quantum agnostic boosting algorithm. Our quantum boosting algorithm has a polynomial improvement in the dependence of the bias of the weak learner over all adaptive quantum boosting algorithms while retaining the standard speedup in the VC dimension over classical boosting algorithms. We then use our quantum boosting algorithm to boost the weak quantum learner we obtained in the previous step to obtain a quantum agnostic learner for decision trees. Using the above framework, we also give quantum decision tree learning algorithms for both the realizable setting and random classification noise model, again without membership queries.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The agnostic setting is the hardest generalization of the PAC model since it is akin to learning with adversarial noise.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.