Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Thermodynamics
Spins-based Quantum Otto Engines and Majorisation
arXiv
Authors: Sachin Sonkar, Ramandeep S. Johal
Year
2022
Paper ID
58666
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
121
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The concept of majorisation is explored as a tool to characterize the performance of a quantum Otto engine in the quasi-static regime. For a working substance in the form of a spin of arbitrary magnitude, majorisation yields a necessary and sufficient condition for the operation of the Otto engine, provided the canonical distribution of the working medium at the hot reservoir is majorised by its canonical distribution at the cold reservoir. For the case of a spin-1/2 interacting with an arbitrary spin via isotropic Heisenberg exchange interaction, we derive sufficient criteria for positive work extraction using the majorisation relation. Finally, local thermodynamics of spins as well as an upper bound on the quantum Otto efficiency is analyzed using the majorisation relation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The concept of majorisation is explored as a tool to characterize the performance of a quantum Otto engine in the quasi-static regime.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.