Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
The threshold for quantum-classical correspondence is D sim hbarfrac43
arXiv
Authors: Felipe Hernández, Daniel Ranard, C. Jess Riedel
Year
2025
Paper ID
5850
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
175
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In chaotic quantum systems, an initially localized quantum state can deviate strongly from the corresponding classical phase-space distribution after the Ehrenfest time tE sim log\(hbar-1\), even in the limit hbar → 0. Decoherence by the environment is often invoked to explain the persistence of the quantum-classical correspondence at longer timescales. Recent rigorous results for Lindblad dynamics with phase-space diffusion strength D show that quantum and classical evolutions remain close for times that are exponentially longer than the Ehrenfest time whenever D gg hbarfrac43, in units set by the classical Hamiltonian. At the same time, some heuristic arguments have suggested the weaker condition D gg hbar2 always suffices. Here we construct an explicit Lindbladian that demonstrates that the scaling D sim hbarfrac43 is indeed the threshold for quantum-classical correspondence beyond the Ehrenfest time. Our example uses a smooth time-dependent Hamiltonian and linear Lindblad operators generating homogeneous isotropic diffusion. It exhibits an hbar-independent quantum-classical discrepancy at the Ehrenfest time whenever D ll hbarfrac43, even for hbar-independent "macroscopic" smooth observables.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In chaotic quantum systems, an initially localized quantum state can deviate strongly from the corresponding classical phase-space distribution after the Ehrenfest time tE sim...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.