Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Relativistic time-of-arrival measurements: predictions, post-selection and causality problem
arXiv
Authors: Charis Anastopoulos, Maria-Electra Plakitsi
Year
2022
Paper ID
58495
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
138
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We analyze time-of-arrival probability distributions for relativistic particles in the context of quantum field theory (QFT). We show that QFT leads to a unique prediction, modulo post-selection that incorporates properties of the apparatus into the initial state. We also show that an experimental distinction of different probability assigments is possible especially in near-field measurements. We also analyze causality in relativistic measurements. We consider a quantum state obtained by a spacetime-localized operation on the vacuum, and we show that detection probabilities are typically characterized by small transient non-causal terms. We explain that these terms originate from Feynman-propagation of the initial operation, because the Feynman propagator does not vanish outside the light-cone. We discuss possible ways to restore causality, and we argue that this may not be possible in measurement models that involve switching the field-apparatus coupling on and off.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We analyze time-of-arrival probability distributions for relativistic particles in the context of quantum field theory (QFT).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.