Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

The electrodynamic origin of the wave-particle duality

arXiv
Authors: Álvaro García López

Year

2022

Paper ID

58394

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

128

Citations

N/A

Abstract

A derivation of pilot waves from electrodynamic self-interactions is presented. For this purpose, we abandon the current paradigm that describes electrodynamic bodies as point masses. Beginning with the Liénard-Wiechert potentials, and assuming that inertia has an electromagnetic origin, the equation of motion of a nonlinear time-delayed oscillator is obtained. We analyze the response of the uniform motion of the electromagnetic charged extended particle to small perturbations, showing that very violent oscillations are unleashed as a result. The frequency of these oscillations is intimately related to the zitterbewegung frequency appearing in Dirac's relativistic wave equation. Finally, we compute the self-energy of the particle. Apart from the rest and the kinetic energy, we uncover a new contribution presenting the same fundamental physical constants that appear in the quantum potential.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • A derivation of pilot waves from electrodynamic self-interactions is presented.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #58394

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.