Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Demonstration of a quantum comparator on an ion-trap quantum device
arXiv
Authors: Tatsuhiko N. Ikeda, Riku Nakama, Shunsuke Saeki, Hiroki Kuwata, Shuhei M. Yoshida, Akira Shimizu, Sho Sugiura
Year
2025
Paper ID
5838
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
121
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum computers are believed to solve a class of computational problems that are based on modular arithmetic faster than classical computers. Among the arithmetic building blocks, comparison of integer pairs is a primitive. Here we report its demonstration in the Reimei quantum computer at RIKEN, whose trapped-ion architecture provides all-to-all qubit connectivity together with high gate fidelities. We observe high success probabilities for bit widths n = 3, 5, 7, and 9: Under a conventional output-only success criterion we obtain 95% at n=9; under a stricter criterion additionally requiring the ancilla to be correct, the success is 69% at n=9. These results demonstrate reliable quantum comparison at scales far beyond those previously achieved experimentally, not only for comparators but also in the broader context of quantum arithmetic circuits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum computers are believed to solve a class of computational problems that are based on modular arithmetic faster than classical computers.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.