Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Algebraic structures underlying quantum independences : Theory and Applications

arXiv
Authors: Raphael Chetrite, Frederic Patras

Year

2022

Paper ID

58310

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

102

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The present survey results from the will to reconcile two approaches to quantum probabilities: one rather physical and coming directly from quantum mechanics, the other more algebraic. The second leading idea is to provide a unified picture introducing jointly to several fields of applications, many of which are probably not all familiar (at leat at the same time and in the form we use to present them) to the readers. Lastly, we take the opportunity to present various results obtained recently that use group and bialgebra techniques to handle notions such as cumulants or Wick polynomials in the various noncommutative probability theories.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The present survey results from the will to reconcile two approaches to quantum probabilities: one rather physical and coming directly from quantum mechanics, the other more...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #58310 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.