Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
High-dimensional entanglement certification: bounding relative entropy of entanglement in 2d+1 experiment-friendly measurements
arXiv
Authors: Alexandria J. Moore, Andrew M. Weiner
Year
2022
Paper ID
58239
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
153
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Entanglement - the coherent correlations between parties in a joint quantum system - is well-understood and quantifiable in the two-dimensional, two-party case. Higher (>2)-dimensional entangled systems hold promise in extending the capabilities of various quantum information applications. Despite the utility of such systems, methods for quantifying high-dimensional entanglement are more limited and experimentally challenging. We review entanglement certification approaches and the large number of - often difficult - measurements required to apply them. We present a novel certification method whose measurement requirements scale linearly with subsystem dimension (scaling with the square-root of the system dimension) and which requires only a single complex measurement. The certification method places a lower-bound on the relative entropy of entanglement of any maximally correlated state thereby certifying system entanglement. A lower bound is also shown for any maximally correlated state in the presence of noise - the expected experimental case. We discuss experimental realization of all required measurements.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Entanglement - the coherent correlations between parties in a joint quantum system - is well-understood and quantifiable in the two-dimensional, two-party case.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.