Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Effect of a moving mirror on the free fall of a quantum particle in a homogeneous gravitational field
arXiv
Authors: J. Allam, A. Matzkin
Year
2022
Paper ID
58201
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
130
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We investigate the effect of time-dependent boundary conditions on the dynamics of a quantum bouncer - a particle falling in a homogeneous gravitational field on a moving mirror. We examine more particularly the way a moving mirror modifies the properties of the entire wavefunction of a falling particle. We find that some effects, such as the fact that a quantum particle hitting a moving mirror may bounce significantly higher than when the mirror is fixed, are in line with classical intuition. Other effects, such as the change in relative phases or in the current density in spatial regions arbitrarily far from the mirror are specifically quantum. We further discuss how the effects produced by a moving mirror could be observed in link with current experiments, in particular with cold neutrons.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We investigate the effect of time-dependent boundary conditions on the dynamics of a quantum bouncer - a particle falling in a homogeneous gravitational field on a moving mirror.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.