Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Optimization

Implementation of Trained Factorization Machine Recommendation System on Quantum Annealer

arXiv
Authors: Chen-Yu Liu, Hsin-Yu Wang, Pei-Yen Liao, Ching-Jui Lai, Min-Hsiu Hsieh

Year

2022

Paper ID

58110

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

121

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Factorization Machine (FM) is the most commonly used model to build a recommendation system since it can incorporate side information to improve performance. However, producing item suggestions for a given user with a trained FM is time-consuming. It requires a run-time of O\((Nm log Nm\)2), where Nm is the number of items in the dataset. To address this problem, we propose a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) scheme to combine with FM and apply quantum annealing (QA) computation. Compared to classical methods, this hybrid algorithm provides a faster than quadratic speedup in finding good user suggestions. We then demonstrate the aforementioned computational advantage on current NISQ hardware by experimenting with a real example on a D-Wave annealer.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Factorization Machine (FM) is the most commonly used model to build a recommendation system since it can incorporate side information to improve performance.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #58110

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.