Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Implementation of Trained Factorization Machine Recommendation System on Quantum Annealer
arXiv
Authors: Chen-Yu Liu, Hsin-Yu Wang, Pei-Yen Liao, Ching-Jui Lai, Min-Hsiu Hsieh
Year
2022
Paper ID
58110
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
121
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Factorization Machine (FM) is the most commonly used model to build a recommendation system since it can incorporate side information to improve performance. However, producing item suggestions for a given user with a trained FM is time-consuming. It requires a run-time of O\((Nm log Nm\)2), where Nm is the number of items in the dataset. To address this problem, we propose a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) scheme to combine with FM and apply quantum annealing (QA) computation. Compared to classical methods, this hybrid algorithm provides a faster than quadratic speedup in finding good user suggestions. We then demonstrate the aforementioned computational advantage on current NISQ hardware by experimenting with a real example on a D-Wave annealer.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Factorization Machine (FM) is the most commonly used model to build a recommendation system since it can incorporate side information to improve performance.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.