Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Filtering crosstalk from bath non-Markovianity via spacetime classical shadows
arXiv
Authors: Gregory A. L. White, Kavan Modi, Charles D. Hill
Year
2022
Paper ID
57956
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
165
Citations
N/A
Abstract
From an open system perspective non-Markovian effects due to a nearby bath or neighbouring qubits are dynamically equivalent. However, there is a conceptual distinction to account for: neighbouring qubits may be controlled. We combine recent advances in non-Markovian quantum process tomography with the framework of classical shadows to characterise spatiotemporal quantum correlations. Observables here constitute operations applied to the system, where the free operation is the maximally depolarising channel. Using this as a causal break, we systematically erase causal pathways to narrow down the progenitors of temporal correlations. We show that one application of this is to filter out the effects of crosstalk and probe only non-Markovianity from an inaccessible bath. It also provides a lens on spatiotemporally spreading correlated noise throughout a lattice from common environments. We demonstrate both examples on synthetic data. Owing to the scaling of classical shadows, we can erase arbitrarily many neighbouring qubits at no extra cost. Our procedure is thus efficient and amenable to systems even with all-to-all interactions.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- From an open system perspective non-Markovian effects due to a nearby bath or neighbouring qubits are dynamically equivalent.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.