Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Simulation
A distribution testing oracle separation between QMA and QCMA
arXiv
Authors: Anand Natarajan, Chinmay Nirkhe
Year
2022
Paper ID
57952
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
112
Citations
N/A
Abstract
It is a long-standing open question in quantum complexity theory whether the definition of textit{non-deterministic} quantum computation requires quantum witnesses \(textsf{QMA}\) or if classical witnesses suffice \(textsf{QCMA}\). We make progress on this question by constructing a randomized classical oracle separating the respective computational complexity classes. Previous separations [Aaronson-Kuperberg (CCC'07), Fefferman-Kimmel (MFCS'18)] required a quantum unitary oracle. The separating problem is deciding whether a distribution supported on regular un-directed graphs either consists of multiple connected components (yes instances) or consists of one expanding connected component (no instances) where the graph is given in an adjacency-list format by the oracle. Therefore, the oracle is a distribution over n-bit boolean functions.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- It is a long-standing open question in quantum complexity theory whether the definition of non-deterministic quantum computation requires quantum witnesses (textsfQMA) or if...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.