Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Polyqubit quantum processing
arXiv
Authors: Wesley C. Campbell, Eric R. Hudson
Year
2022
Paper ID
57948
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
105
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We describe the encoding of multiple qubits per atom in trapped atom quantum processors and methods for performing both intra- and inter-atomic gates on participant qubits without disturbing the spectator qubits stored in the same atoms. We also introduce techniques for selective state preparation and measurement of individual qubits that leave the information encoded in the other qubits intact, a capability required for qubit quantum error correction. The additional internal states needed for polyqubit processing are already present in atomic processors, suggesting that the resource cost associated with this multiplicative increase in qubit number could be a good bargain in the short to medium term.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We describe the encoding of multiple qubits per atom in trapped atom quantum processors and methods for performing both intra- and inter-atomic gates on participant qubits...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.