Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Quantum Protocol for Decision Making and Verifying Truthfulness among N-quantum Parties: Solution and Extension of the Quantum Coin Flipping Game

arXiv
Authors: Kazuki Ikeda, Adam Lowe

Year

2022

Paper ID

57695

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

107

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We devised a protocol that allows two parties, who may malfunction or intentionally convey incorrect information in communication through a quantum channel, to verify each other's measurements and agree on each other's results. This has particular relevance in a modified version of the quantum coin flipping game where the possibility of the players cheating is now removed. Furthermore, the analysis is extended to N-parties communicating with each other, where we propose multiple solutions for the verification of each player's measurement. The results in the N-party scenario could have particular relevance for the implementation of future quantum networks, where verification of quantum information is a necessity.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We devised a protocol that allows two parties, who may malfunction or intentionally convey incorrect information in communication through a quantum channel, to verify each...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #57695 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.