Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Quantum Protocol for Decision Making and Verifying Truthfulness among N-quantum Parties: Solution and Extension of the Quantum Coin Flipping Game
arXiv
Authors: Kazuki Ikeda, Adam Lowe
Year
2022
Paper ID
57695
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
107
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We devised a protocol that allows two parties, who may malfunction or intentionally convey incorrect information in communication through a quantum channel, to verify each other's measurements and agree on each other's results. This has particular relevance in a modified version of the quantum coin flipping game where the possibility of the players cheating is now removed. Furthermore, the analysis is extended to N-parties communicating with each other, where we propose multiple solutions for the verification of each player's measurement. The results in the N-party scenario could have particular relevance for the implementation of future quantum networks, where verification of quantum information is a necessity.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We devised a protocol that allows two parties, who may malfunction or intentionally convey incorrect information in communication through a quantum channel, to verify each...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.