!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Quantum versus Population Dynamics over Cayley Graphs
arXiv
Authors: Emil Prodan
Year
2022
Paper ID
57398
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
118
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Consider a graph whose vertices are populated by identical objects, together with an algorithm for the time-evolution of the number of objects placed at each of the vertices. The discrete dynamics of these objects can be observed and studied using simple and inexpensive laboratory settings. There are many similarities but also many differences between such population dynamics and the quantum dynamics of a particle hopping on the same graph. In this work, we show that a specific decoration of the original graph enables an exact mapping between the models of population and quantum dynamics. As such, population dynamics over graphs is yet another classical platform that can simulate quantum effects. Several examples are used to demonstrate this claim.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Consider a graph whose vertices are populated by identical objects, together with an algorithm for the time-evolution of the number of objects placed at each of the vertices.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.