Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning

A Quadratic Sample Complexity Reduction for Agnostic Learning via Quantum Algorithms

arXiv
Authors: Daniel Z. Zanger

Year

2023

Paper ID

57280

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

117

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Using quantum algorithms, we obtain, for accuracy ε>0 and confidence 1-δ,0<δ<1, a new sample complexity upper bound of O\((mbox{log}(frac{1}δ\))/ε) as ε,δ→ 0 for a general agnostic learning model, provided the hypothesis class is of finite cardinality. This greatly improves upon a corresponding sample complexity of asymptotic order Θ\((mbox{log}(frac{1}δ\))/ε2) known in the literature to be attainable by means of classical (non-quantum) algorithms for an agnostic learning problem also with hypothesis set of finite cardinality (see, for example, Arunachalam and de Wolf (2018) and the classical statistical learning theory references cited there). Thus, for general agnostic learning, the quantum speedup in the rate of learning that we achieve with respect to these results is quadratic in ε-1.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Using quantum algorithms, we obtain, for accuracy ε>0 and confidence 1-δ,0

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #57280 #69596 Comprehensive pKa Data Augmenta... #69584 OQMD: Single-Qubit Rotation Con... #69549 REGRID-QAOA: A Resource-Efficie... #69539 Learning ground state observabl...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.