Quick Navigation
Topics
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Elimination of Static Hazards in Asynchronous Sequential Circuits using Quantum dot Cellular Automata
arXiv
Authors: Angshuman Khan, Chiradeep Mukherjee, Ankan Kumar Chakraborty, Ratna Chakrabarty, Debashis De
Year
2023
Paper ID
57041
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
89
Citations
N/A
Abstract
There is nowhere else in emerging technology, but in Quantum-dot Cellular Automata, one can find high speed, low power operation, and high packaging density, which deals with electrostatic interaction between electrons within a cell. Literature survey lacks in hazards free design of QCA circuit. Hazards create ambiguous and unpredictable output, which can be avoided. This work considers both hazards and hazards-free asynchronous sequential circuits; both are compared in terms of kink energy, and a better one has been proposed. The circuit simulation has been verified in the QCADesigner tool.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- There is nowhere else in emerging technology, but in Quantum-dot Cellular Automata, one can find high speed, low power operation, and high packaging density, which deals with...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.