Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning

Adaptivity can help exponentially for shadow tomography

arXiv
Authors: Sitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Zhihan Zhang

Year

2024

Paper ID

56965

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

110

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In recent years there has been significant interest in understanding the statistical complexity of learning from quantum data under the constraint that one can only make unentangled measurements. While a key challenge in establishing tight lower bounds in this setting is to deal with the fact that the measurements can be chosen in an adaptive fashion, a recurring theme has been that adaptivity offers little advantage over more straightforward, nonadaptive protocols. In this note, we offer a counterpoint to this. We show that for the basic task of shadow tomography, protocols that use adaptively chosen two-copy measurements can be exponentially more sample-efficient than any protocol that uses nonadaptive two-copy measurements.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In recent years there has been significant interest in understanding the statistical complexity of learning from quantum data under the constraint that one can only make...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #56965 #69596 Comprehensive pKa Data Augmenta... #69584 OQMD: Single-Qubit Rotation Con... #69549 REGRID-QAOA: A Resource-Efficie... #69539 Learning ground state observabl...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.