Quick Navigation
Topics
Photonic Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
A Conceptual Technology-Dependent Framework of Ternary Quantum Gates
arXiv
Authors: Ali Al-Bayaty
Year
2026
Paper ID
56834
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
90
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This paper introduces a conceptual framework of technology-dependent ternary quantum gates that could be implemented and fabricated into future superconducting and photonic quantum systems for operating 3-valued quantum bits (qutrits). The "technology-dependent" means that such ternary quantum gates are on-purpose designed analogy to the contemporary binary quantum gates. Conceptually, the final built technology-dependent one-, two-, and three-qutrit gates are Chrestenson, Z3, 01, 02, 12, +1, +2 (including their corresponding inverse and controlled gates), a non-phase relative SWAP gate, and a cost-effective Toffoli gate, which is a generic ternary Galois Field (GF3) multiplication and addition circuit.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This paper introduces a conceptual framework of technology-dependent ternary quantum gates that could be implemented and fabricated into future superconducting and photonic...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.