Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Single-copy stabilizer learning: average case and worst case
arXiv
Authors: Gyungmin Cho, Dohun Kim
Year
2026
Paper ID
56780
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
122
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study single-copy stabilizer learning, the problem of identifying a stabilizer group of dimension n-t from an n-qubit quantum state ρ. We obtain two complementary results. First, in the average case, logarithmic-depth local Clifford circuits suffice to efficiently learn almost all stabilizer groups with t=O\(log n\), instead of the linear-depth measurements required in previous approaches. We support this result with numerical simulations for systems of up to 100 qubits. Second, we show that, in the worst case, any adaptive single-copy measurement scheme requires a number of samples that scales exponentially in t. Together with existing results on two-copy learning, our findings suggest that, for large t, identifying Pauli symmetries of a quantum system exhibits a quantum advantage in the learning setting.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study single-copy stabilizer learning, the problem of identifying a stabilizer group of dimension n-t from an n-qubit quantum state ρ.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.