Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Impact of thermal and dissipative effects in a periodically-kicked quantum battery
arXiv
Authors: Sebastián V. Romero, Xi Chen, Yue Ban
Year
2026
Paper ID
56765
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
117
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum batteries (QBs) have emerged as a promising route for fast energy storage and on-chip power supply in quantum devices. Given the limited analytical understanding of open Floquet QBs, we employ the kicked-Ising model as a tractable platform to systematically study its performance under realistic conditions, including finite temperature effects and environmental dissipation. Starting from Gibbs states of the transverse-field Ising model, we incorporate thermal and decoherence effects along the evolution, using both analytical and numerical approaches. Taking ergotropy as a central figure of merit, we characterize the injected and extractable energy, and identify regimes where charging remains robust despite environmental effects. Our results provide a systematic framework for assessing QB performance under thermal and dissipative effects.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum batteries (QBs) have emerged as a promising route for fast energy storage and on-chip power supply in quantum devices.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.