Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Universal Characterization of Classical Qubit Noise
arXiv
Authors: Yuan-De Jin, Zheng-Fei Ye, Wen-Long Ma
Year
2026
Paper ID
56669
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
152
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We propose a general method to fully characterize a classical stochastic noise process causing qubit dephasing through repetitive Ramsey interferometry measurements (RIMs) on the qubit. Compared to filter-function-based spectroscopy, our method does not require complicated dynamical decoupling pulses and can directly detect arbitrary-order correlation functions of such noise processes. We show that each RIM with a short evolution time and suitably chosen control pulses can perform a direct sampling of the noise field and the n-point correlations of the RIM outcomes are proportional to the n-point correlation functions of the noise processes. Then we numerically demonstrate this method for characterizing two typical examples of classical noises, including the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes producing Gaussian noises and an ensemble of TLFs producing non-Gaussian noises. Our method is independent of qubit lifetime and robust against qubit decoherence and measurement errors, thus offering a universal and efficient protocol for qubit noise spectroscopy across diverse platforms.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We propose a general method to fully characterize a classical stochastic noise process causing qubit dephasing through repetitive Ramsey interferometry measurements (RIMs) on...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.