Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Reorganizing Quantum Measurement Records Improves Time-Series Prediction
arXiv
Authors: Markus Baumann, Maximilian Zorn, Thomas Gabor, Claudia Linnhoff-Popien, Jonas Stein
Year
2026
Paper ID
56486
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
159
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Near-term quantum computers are accessed through repeated circuit executions, which produce finite measurement records rather than exact deterministic outputs. In quantum reservoir computing, these records are converted to feature vectors for a classical readout. The standard expectation-value approach averages all shots from one labeled time step into a single feature vector. This reduces finite-shot noise, but it also gives the readout only one training example from many circuit executions. We introduce split-ensemble training: the same shots are split into groups, and each group average is used as a separate, partially denoised feature vector for the same target. The quantum circuit, task, and measurement budget remain unchanged. Across simulated forecasting benchmarks and real hardware experiments, this simple reorganization improves prediction when full averaging leaves the readout with too few training examples, with the strongest gains observed on hardware. Our results establish shot-record organization as a simple, broadly applicable algorithmic lever for improving near-term quantum learning without additional quantum hardware cost.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Near-term quantum computers are accessed through repeated circuit executions, which produce finite measurement records rather than exact deterministic outputs.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.