Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Device Fabrication Process Engineering Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum Chemistry

Quantum-chemical insights into the design of molecule-modified Pt catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction.

PubMed
Authors: Tada K, Kinugawa S, Yamazaki SI, Kitano Y, Kitagawa Y, Asahi M, Chida Y, Ioroi T

Year

2026

Paper ID

56429

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

62

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The present study provides insights into the rational design of molecular modifiers for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts, which are of significant societal interest. Specifically, (1) the strength of modifier-Pt interactions and ORR activity have a volcano-shaped correlation, and (2) the strength is explained using the HOMO of the modifier. These are derived from the coordination bond affinity between the organic modifier and Pt.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The present study provides insights into the rational design of molecular modifiers for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts, which are of significant societal interest.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #56429 #69598 The classical boundaries of the... #69597 Tripartite Entanglement in $e^+... #69596 Comprehensive pKa Data Augmenta... #69593 Local correlations in long-rang...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.