Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Chemistry
Quantum Simulation
Nuclear Binding Energies from Composite-Knot Ropelength: A Topological Model That Mirrors Quantum-Mechanical Phenomenology
Crossref
Authors: Thomas Riedel
Year
2026
Paper ID
56396
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
169
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We report a curious numerical observation: If atomic nuclei are modelled as connect-sums of threefoil knots with alternating chirality, the ropelength of the composite knot—a purely geometric quantity requiring no quantum mechanics—tracks the experimental binding-energy curve from hydrogen to uranium. A two-parameter fit to 50 nuclei gives R2=0.9998 coefficient of determination; 1 = perfect fit and RMS=6.9MeV (root-mean-square deviation between model and experiment), comparable to the five-parameter Bethe–Weizsäcker formula RMS=8.3MeV at less than half the parameter count. Out-of-sample predictions for Pu244 and Cf252, not used in the fit, are accurate to 0.4MeV and 8.4MeV, respectively. What makes the observation worth reporting is not the fit itself, but the range of nuclear phenomenology that emerges uninstructed from the topology: saturation, surface energy, isospin pairing, odd-even staggering, and geometric analogues of nuclear isomers all appear as consequences of the connect-sum construction, without additional assumptions. We catalogue these correspondences, assess which are structural and which may be coincidental, and identify concrete numerical tests that would distinguish the two possibilities.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We report a curious numerical observation: If atomic nuclei are modelled as connect-sums of threefoil knots with alternating chirality, the ropelength of the composite knot—a...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.