Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Error tradeoff relation for estimating the unitary-shift parameter of a relativistic spin-1/2 particle
arXiv
Authors: Shin Funada, Jun Suzuki
Year
2023
Paper ID
56204
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
111
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the existence of a nontrivial tradeoff relation for estimating two unitary-shift parameters in a relativistic spin-1/2 system. It is shown that any moving observer cannot estimate two parameters simultaneously, even though a parametric model is classical in the rest frame. This transition from the classical model to a genuine quantum model is investigated analytically using a one-parameter family of quantum Fisher information matrices. This paper proposes to use an indicator that can not only detect the existence of a tradeoff relation but can also evaluate its strength. Based on the proposed indicator, this paper investigates the nature of the tradeoff relation in detail.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The purpose of this paper is to discuss the existence of a nontrivial tradeoff relation for estimating two unitary-shift parameters in a relativistic spin-1/2 system.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.