Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Communication Networks Quantum Cryptography Security Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

Simple efficient decoders for quantum key distribution over quantum repeaters with encoding

arXiv
Authors: Yumang Jing, Mohsen Razavi

Year

2020

Paper ID

556

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

156

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study the implementation of quantum key distribution (QKD) systems over quantum repeater infrastructures. We particularly consider quantum repeaters with encoding and compare them with probabilistic quantum repeaters. To that end, we propose two decoder structures for encoded repeaters that not only improve system performance but also make the implementation aspects easier by removing two-qubit gates from the QKD decoder. By developing several scalable numerical and analytical techniques, we then identify the resilience of the setup to various sources of error in gates, measurement modules, and initialization of the setup. We apply our techniques to three- and five-qubit repetition codes and obtain the normalized secret key generation rate per memory per second for encoded and probabilistic quantum repeaters. We quantify the regimes of operation, where one class of repeater outperforms the other, and find that there are feasible regimes of operation where encoded repeaters - based on simple three-qubit repetition codes - could offer practical advantages.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

Category Correction Request

Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.

Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.

Log In to Submit

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #556 #22321 Quantum Secured Internet Transport #22309 Lightweight Quantum Security Pr...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.