Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Virtual states in the coupled-channel problems with an improved complex scaling method
arXiv
Authors: Yan-Ke Chen, Lu Meng, Zi-Yang Lin, Shi-Lin Zhu
Year
2023
Paper ID
55538
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
101
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We improve the complex scaling method (CSM) to obtain virtual states, which were previously challenging in the conventional CSM. Our approach solves the Schrödinger equation in the momentum space as an eigenvalue problem by choosing the flexible contours. It proves to be highly effective in identifying the poles across the different Riemann sheets in the multichannel scatterings. It is more straightforward and efficient than searching for the zeros of the Fredholm determinant of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation using the root-finding algorithms. This advancement significantly extends the capabilities of the CSM in accurately characterizing the resonances and virtual states in quantum systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We improve the complex scaling method (CSM) to obtain virtual states, which were previously challenging in the conventional CSM.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.