Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Gaussian boson sampling at finite temperature
arXiv
Authors: Gabriele Bressanini, Hyukjoon Kwon, M. S. Kim
Year
2023
Paper ID
55488
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
152
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) is a promising candidate for an experimental demonstration of quantum advantage using photons. However, sufficiently large noise might hinder a GBS implementation from entering the regime where quantum speedup is achievable. Here, we investigate how thermal noise affects the classical intractability of generic quantum optical sampling experiments, GBS being a particular instance of the latter. We do so by establishing sufficient conditions for an efficient simulation to be feasible, expressed in the form of inequalities between the relevant parameters that characterize the system and its imperfections. We demonstrate that the addition of thermal noise has the effect of tightening the constraints on the remaining noise parameters, required to show quantum advantage. Furthermore, we show that there exist a threshold temperature at which any quantum sampling experiment becomes classically simulable, and provide an intuitive physical interpretation by relating this occurrence with the disappearance of the quantum state's non-classical properties.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) is a promising candidate for an experimental demonstration of quantum advantage using photons.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.