Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Single-shot single-mode optical two-parameter displacement estimation beyond classical limit
arXiv
Authors: Fumiya Hanamura, Warit Asavanant, Seigo Kikura, Moeto Mishima, Shigehito Miki, Hirotaka Terai, Masahiro Yabuno, Fumihiro China, Kosuke Fukui, Mamoru Endo, Akira Furusawa
Year
2023
Paper ID
55386
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
82
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Uncertainty principle prohibits the precise measurement of both components of displacement parameters in phase space. We have theoretically shown that this limit can be beaten using single-photon states, in a single-shot and single-mode setting [F. Hanamura et al., Phys. Rev. A 104, 062601 (2021)]. In this paper, we validate this by experimentally beating the classical limit. In optics, this is the first experiment to estimate both parameters of displacement using non-Gaussian states. This result is related to many important applications, such as quantum error correction.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Uncertainty principle prohibits the precise measurement of both components of displacement parameters in phase space.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.