Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Channels Communication Theory
Quantum Gate Fidelity Benchmarking
The <i>isocloso</i> capped pentagonal bipyramid versus the <i>closo</i> bisdisphenoid in hypoelectronic eight‐vertex metallaboranes having 16 skeletal electrons
Crossref
Authors: Raluca Anamaria Şeptelean, Amr A. A. Attia, Alexandru Lupan, R. Bruce King
Year
2018
Paper ID
5536
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
153
Citations
N/A
Abstract
AbstractThe lowest energy structures for all of the eight‐vertex [M]CB6H7 {[M] = CpFe, CpRu. Co(CO)2, Rh(CO)2, (Me3P)2Fe(H), (Me3P)2Ru(H)}, [M]C2B5H7 {[M] = CpMn, CpRe, Cr(CO)3, Mo(CO)3}, and [M]2C2B4H6 [M] = CpFe, CpRu systems having 16 skeletal electrons were found by density functional theory to be capped pentagonal bipyramids providing a degree 6 vertex for a metal atom. Thus the capped pentagonal bipyramid plays a similar role for eight‐vertex metallaboranes with 16 skeletal electrons as the isocloso deltahedra play in 9‐ and 10‐vertex metallaboranes with 18 and 20 skeletal electrons, respectively. Furthermore, in all of these metallaborane systems the closo bisdisphenoidal structures were always found to be higher energy structures than their capped pentagonal bipyramidal isomers. For the bimetallic systems Cp2M2C2B4H6 M = Fe, Ru even higher energy hexagonal bipyramid structures with degree 6 vertices for both metal atoms were also found.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Channels & Communication Theory research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- AbstractThe lowest energy structures for all of the eight‐vertex [M]CB6H7 [M] = CpFe, CpRu.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.