Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Optimization Quantum Machine Learning

Toward a Unified Hybrid HPCQC Toolchain

arXiv
Authors: Philipp Seitz, Amr Elsharkawy, Xiao-Ting Michelle To, Martin Schulz

Year

2023

Paper ID

55196

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

80

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In the expanding field of Quantum Computing (QC), efficient and seamless integration of QC and high performance computing (HPC) elements (e.g., quantum hardware, classical hardware, and software infrastructure on both sides) plays a crucial role. This paper addresses the development of a unified toolchain designed for hybrid quantum-classical systems. Our work proposes a design for a unified hybrid high performance computing - quantum computing (HPCQC) toolchain that tackles pressing issues such as scalability, cross-technology execution, and ahead-of-time (AOT) optimization.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In the expanding field of Quantum Computing (QC), efficient and seamless integration of QC and high performance computing (HPC) elements (e.g., quantum hardware, classical...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #55196 #69549 REGRID-QAOA: A Resource-Efficie... #69596 Comprehensive pKa Data Augmenta... #69584 OQMD: Single-Qubit Rotation Con... #69539 Learning ground state observabl...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.