Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Coherence as an indicator to discern electromagnetically induced transparency and Autler-Townes splitting
arXiv
Authors: Arif Warsi Laskar, Pratik Adhikary, Niharika Singh, Saikat Ghosh
Year
2023
Paper ID
55152
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
153
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) and Autler-Townes splitting (ATS) are generally characterized and distinguished by the width of the transparency created in the absorption profile of a weak probe in presence of a strong control field. This often leads to ambiguities, as both phenomena yield similar spectroscopic signature. However, an objective method based on Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) test offers a quantitative way to discern the two regimes when applied on the probe absorption profile. The obtained transition value of control field strength was found to be higher than the value given by pole analysis of the corresponding off-diagonal density matrix element. By contrast, we apply the test on ground state coherence and the measured coherence quantifier, which yields a distinct transition point around the predicted value even in presence of noise. Our test accurately captures the transition between two regimes, indicating that a proper measure of coherence is essential for making such distinctions.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) and Autler-Townes splitting (ATS) are generally characterized and distinguished by the width of the transparency created in the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.