Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Optimising quantum circuits is generally hard
arXiv
Authors: John van de Wetering, Matt Amy
Year
2023
Paper ID
54947
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
184
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In order for quantum computations to be done as efficiently as possible it is important to optimise the number of gates used in the underlying quantum circuits. In this paper we find that many gate optimisation problems for approximately universal quantum circuits are NP-hard. In particular, we show that optimising the T-count or T-depth in Clifford+T circuits, which are important metrics for the computational cost of executing fault-tolerant quantum computations, is NP-hard by reducing the problem to Boolean satisfiability. With a similar argument we show that optimising the number of CNOT gates or Hadamard gates in a Clifford+T circuit is also NP-hard. Again varying the same argument we also establish the hardness of optimising the number of Toffoli gates in a reversible classical circuit. We find an upper bound to the problems of T-count and Toffoli-count of NPNQP. Finally, we also show that for any non-Clifford gate G it is NP-hard to optimise the G-count over the Clifford+G gate set, where we only have to match the target unitary within some small distance in the operator norm.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In order for quantum computations to be done as efficiently as possible it is important to optimise the number of gates used in the underlying quantum circuits.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.