Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Thermodynamics
Work Statistics and Adiabatic Assumption in Nonequilibrium Many-Body Theory
arXiv
Authors: Yi Zuo, Qinghong Yang, Bang-Gui Liu, Dong E Liu
Year
2023
Paper ID
54937
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
129
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Keldysh field theory, based on adiabatic assumptions, serves as an widely used framework for addressing nonequilibrium many-body systems. Nonetheless, the validity of such adiabatic assumptions when addressing interacting Gibbs states remains a topic of contention. We use the knowledge of work statistics developed in nonequilibrium thermodynamics to study this problem. Consequently, we deduce a universal theorem delineating the characteristics of evolutions that transition an initial Gibbs state to another. Based on this theorem, we analytically ascertain that adiabatic evolutions fail to transition a non-interacting Gibbs state to its interacting counterpart. However, this adiabatic approach remains a superior approximation relative to its non-adiabatic counterpart. Numerics verifying our theory and predictions are also provided. Furthermore, our findings render insights into the preparation of Gibbs states within the domain of quantum computation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Keldysh field theory, based on adiabatic assumptions, serves as an widely used framework for addressing nonequilibrium many-body systems.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.