Quick Navigation

Topics

Superconducting Qubits Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing Quantum Chemistry

Gate-tunable Superconductivity in Hybrid InSb-Pb Nanowires

arXiv
Authors: Yan Chen, David van Driel, Charalampos Lampadaris, Sabbir A Khan, Khalifah Alattallah, Lunjie Zeng, Eva Olsson, Tom Dvir, Peter Krogstrup, Yu Liu

Year

2023

Paper ID

54810

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

72

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We present a report on hybrid InSb-Pb nanowires that combine high spin-orbit coupling with a high critical field and a large superconducting gap. Material characterization indicates the Pb layer of high crystal quality on the nanowire side facets. Hard induced superconducting gaps and gate-tunable supercurrent are observed in the hybrid nanowires. These results showcase the promising potential of this material combination for a diverse range of applications in hybrid quantum transport devices.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We present a report on hybrid InSb-Pb nanowires that combine high spin-orbit coupling with a high critical field and a large superconducting gap.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #54810 #69596 Comprehensive pKa Data Augmenta... #69595 Tantalum as a base material for... #69589 An integrated ultrahigh vacuum ... #69558 Analyzing Initialization Strate...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.