Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Preparing pure 43Ca^+ samples in an ion trap with photoionization and parametric excitations

arXiv
Authors: C. -H. Kuo, Y. -C. Hsiao, C. -Y. Jhang, Y. -D. Chen, S. Tung

Year

2023

Paper ID

54624

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

106

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We present a practical scheme for the efficient preparation of laser-cooled 43Ca^+ ions in an ion trap. Our approach integrates two well-established methods: isotope-selective photoionization and isotope-specific parametric excitation. Drawing inspiration from the individual merits of each method, we have successfully integrated these techniques to prepare extended chains of 43Ca^+ ions, overcoming the challenge posed by their low natural abundance of 0.135% in a natural source. Furthermore, we explore the subtleties of our scheme, focusing on the influence of different factors on the purification process. Our investigation contributes to a broader understanding of the technique and highlights the adaptability of established methods in addressing specific isotopic challenges.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We present a practical scheme for the efficient preparation of laser-cooled ^43Ca^+ ions in an ion trap.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #54624 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.