Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Preparing pure 43Ca^+ samples in an ion trap with photoionization and parametric excitations
arXiv
Authors: C. -H. Kuo, Y. -C. Hsiao, C. -Y. Jhang, Y. -D. Chen, S. Tung
Year
2023
Paper ID
54624
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
106
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a practical scheme for the efficient preparation of laser-cooled 43Ca^+ ions in an ion trap. Our approach integrates two well-established methods: isotope-selective photoionization and isotope-specific parametric excitation. Drawing inspiration from the individual merits of each method, we have successfully integrated these techniques to prepare extended chains of 43Ca^+ ions, overcoming the challenge posed by their low natural abundance of 0.135% in a natural source. Furthermore, we explore the subtleties of our scheme, focusing on the influence of different factors on the purification process. Our investigation contributes to a broader understanding of the technique and highlights the adaptability of established methods in addressing specific isotopic challenges.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a practical scheme for the efficient preparation of laser-cooled ^43Ca^+ ions in an ion trap.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.