Quick Navigation
Topics
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
Origin of electrical noise near charge neutrality in dual gated graphene device
arXiv
Authors: Aaryan Mehra, Roshan Jesus Mathew, Chandan Kumar
Year
2023
Paper ID
54609
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
122
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This letter investigates low frequency 1/ f noise in hBN encapsulated graphene device in a dual gated geometry. The noise study is performed as a function of top gate carrier density (nT G) at different back gate densities (nBG). The noise at low nBG is found to be independent of top gate carrier density. With increasing nBG, noise value increases and a noise peak is observed near charge inhomogeneity of the device. Further increase in nBG leads to decrease in noise magnitude. The shape of the noise is found to be closely related to charge inhomogeneity region of the device. Moreover, the noise and conductivity data near charge neutrality shows clear evidence of noise emanating from combination of charge number and mobility fluctuation
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This letter investigates low frequency 1/ f noise in hBN encapsulated graphene device in a dual gated geometry.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.