Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Complex classical paths in quantum reflections and tunneling
arXiv
Authors: Job Feldbrugge, Dylan L. Jow, Ue-Li Pen
Year
2023
Paper ID
54579
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
115
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The real-time propagator of the symmetric Rosen-Morse, also known as the symmetric modified Pöschl-Teller, barrier is expressed in the Picard-Lefschetz path integral formalism using real and complex classical paths. We explain how the interference pattern in the real-time propagator and energy propagator is organized by caustics and Stoke's phenomena, and list the relevant real and complex classical paths as a function of the initial and final position. We discover the occurrence of singularity crossings, where the analytic continuation of the complex classical path no longer satisfies the boundary value problem and needs to be analytically continued. Moreover, we demonstrate how these singularity crossings play a central role in the real-time description of quantum tunneling.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The real-time propagator of the symmetric Rosen-Morse, also known as the symmetric modified Pöschl-Teller, barrier is expressed in the Picard-Lefschetz path integral formalism...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.