Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Quantum enhanced SU(1,1) matter wave interferometry in a ring cavity

arXiv
Authors: Ivor Krešić, Thorsten Ackemann

Year

2023

Paper ID

54538

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

127

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Quantum squeezed states offer metrological enhancement as compared to their classical counterparts. Here, we devise and numerically explore a novel method for performing SU(1,1) interferometry beyond the standard quantum limit, using quasi-cyclic nonlinear wave mixing dynamics of ultracold atoms in a ring cavity. The method is based on generating quantum correlations between many atoms via photon mediated optomechanical interaction. Timescales of the interferometer operation are here given by the inverse of photonic recoil frequency, and are orders of magnitude shorter than the timescales of collisional spin-mixing based interferometers. Such shorter timescales should enable not only faster measurement cycles, but also lower atomic losses from the trap during measurement, which may lead to significant quantum metrological gain of matter wave interferometry in state of the art cavity setups.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Quantum squeezed states offer metrological enhancement as compared to their classical counterparts.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #54538

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.