Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum enhanced SU(1,1) matter wave interferometry in a ring cavity
arXiv
Authors: Ivor Krešić, Thorsten Ackemann
Year
2023
Paper ID
54538
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
127
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum squeezed states offer metrological enhancement as compared to their classical counterparts. Here, we devise and numerically explore a novel method for performing SU(1,1) interferometry beyond the standard quantum limit, using quasi-cyclic nonlinear wave mixing dynamics of ultracold atoms in a ring cavity. The method is based on generating quantum correlations between many atoms via photon mediated optomechanical interaction. Timescales of the interferometer operation are here given by the inverse of photonic recoil frequency, and are orders of magnitude shorter than the timescales of collisional spin-mixing based interferometers. Such shorter timescales should enable not only faster measurement cycles, but also lower atomic losses from the trap during measurement, which may lead to significant quantum metrological gain of matter wave interferometry in state of the art cavity setups.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum squeezed states offer metrological enhancement as compared to their classical counterparts.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.