You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Quantum forgery attacks on COPA,AES-COPA and marble authenticated encryption algorithms
arXiv
Authors: Yinsong Xu, Wenjie Liu, Wenbin Yu
Year
2023
Paper ID
54510
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
140
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The classic forgery attacks on COPA, AES-COPA and Marble authenticated encryption algorithms need to query about 2^(n/2) times, and their success probability is not high. To solve this problem, the corresponding quantum forgery attacks on COPA, AES-COPA and Marble authenticated encryption algorithms are presented. In the quantum forgery attacks on COPA and AES-COPA, we use Simon's algorithm to find the period of the tag generation function in COPA and AES-COPA by querying in superposition, and then generate a forged tag for a new message. In the quantum forgery attack on Marble, Simon's algorithm is used to recover the secret parameter L, and the forged tag can be computed with L. Compared with classic forgery attacks on COPA, AES-COPA and Marble, our attack can reduce the number of queries from O2^(n/2) to O(n) and improve success probability close to 100%.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The classic forgery attacks on COPA, AES-COPA and Marble authenticated encryption algorithms need to query about 2^(n/2) times, and their success probability is not high.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.