Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
A hybrid quantum-classical approach to warm-starting optimization
arXiv
Authors: Vanessa Dehn, Thomas Wellens
Year
2023
Paper ID
54481
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
105
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a promising candidate for solving combinatorial optimization problems more efficiently than classical computers. Recent studies have shown that warm-starting the standard algorithm improves the performance. In this paper we compare the performance of standard QAOA with that of warm-start QAOA in the context of portfolio optimization and investigate the warm-start approach for different problem instances. In particular, we analyze the extent to which the improved performance of warm-start QAOA is due to quantum effects, and show that the results can be reproduced or even surpassed by a purely classical preprocessing of the original problem followed by standard QAOA.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a promising candidate for solving combinatorial optimization problems more efficiently than classical computers.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.