Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Optimization

A hybrid quantum-classical approach to warm-starting optimization

arXiv
Authors: Vanessa Dehn, Thomas Wellens

Year

2023

Paper ID

54481

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

105

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a promising candidate for solving combinatorial optimization problems more efficiently than classical computers. Recent studies have shown that warm-starting the standard algorithm improves the performance. In this paper we compare the performance of standard QAOA with that of warm-start QAOA in the context of portfolio optimization and investigate the warm-start approach for different problem instances. In particular, we analyze the extent to which the improved performance of warm-start QAOA is due to quantum effects, and show that the results can be reproduced or even surpassed by a purely classical preprocessing of the original problem followed by standard QAOA.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a promising candidate for solving combinatorial optimization problems more efficiently than classical computers.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #54481 #69549 REGRID-QAOA: A Resource-Efficie... #69528 QALM: Escaping Local Minima via...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.