Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
A no free lunch theorem for untrained quantum circuits in machine learning
arXiv
Authors: Steven Herbert
Year
2023
Paper ID
54479
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
122
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This paper proves that if an untrained quantum circuit is used as a resource in a machine learning workflow, then on average no quantum circuit is better than any other that can achieve the same set of computational effects. This is the titular no free lunch theorem. The paper also proves a supporting theorem that even if the idealisations of the no free lunch theorem are omitted, the average quantum advantage remains negligible at best. These results cast serious doubt on several proposals to use untrained quantum circuits in machine learning workflows: at best such claims should be substantiated empirically, as this paper proves there is no a priori theoretical reason to suppose that introducing an untrained quantum circuit will increase performance.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This paper proves that if an untrained quantum circuit is used as a resource in a machine learning workflow, then on average no quantum circuit is better than any other that...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.