Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
QED calculations of the nuclear recoil effect in muonic atoms
arXiv
Authors: Vladimir A. Yerokhin, Natalia S. Oreshkina
Year
2023
Paper ID
54466
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
124
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The nuclear recoil effect, known also as the mass shift, is one of theoretical contributions to the energy levels in muonic atoms. Accurate theoretical predictions are therefore needed for extracting e.g. the nuclear charge radii from experimental spectra. We report rigorous QED calculations of the nuclear recoil correction in muonic atoms, carried out to all orders in the nuclear binding strength parameter Zα (where Z is the nuclear charge number and α is the fine structure constant). The calculations show differences with the previous approximate treatment of this effect, most pronounced for the lowest-lying bound states. The calculated recoil correction was found to be sensitive to the nuclear charge radius, which needs to be accounted for when extracting nuclear parameters from the measured spectra.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The nuclear recoil effect, known also as the mass shift, is one of theoretical contributions to the energy levels in muonic atoms.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.