Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Steering vs Entanglement and Extracting Work in an Anisotropic Two-Qubit Heisenberg Model in Presence of External Magnetic Fields with DM and KSEA Interactions
arXiv
Authors: Mohamed Amazioug, Mohammed Daoud
Year
2023
Paper ID
54425
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
120
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We examine the Dzyaloshinski-Moriya (DM) and Kaplan-Shekhtman-Entin-Wohlman-Aharony (KSEA) interactions in thermal equilibrium submitted to the anisotropic Heisenberg two-qubit model in an inhomogeneous magnetic field. The steerability between the two qubits is evaluated using quantum steering. The concurrence serves as a witness to quantum entanglement. Both the extracted work and the ideal efficiency of the two qubits are quantified. We discuss how quantum correlations behave in relation to the bath's temperature and the Kaplan-Shekhtman-Entin-Wohlman-Aharony coupling parameter. We find that the nonclassical correlations in a two-qubit Heisenberg XYZ Model are fragile under thermal effects. Nevertheless, the results indicate that the concurrence is stronger than quantum steering under thermal effects. We obtained that an extraction of work is comparable with the bare energies.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We examine the Dzyaloshinski-Moriya (DM) and Kaplan-Shekhtman-Entin-Wohlman-Aharony (KSEA) interactions in thermal equilibrium submitted to the anisotropic Heisenberg two-qubit...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.