Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning

SLIQ: Quantum Image Similarity Networks on Noisy Quantum Computers

arXiv
Authors: Daniel Silver, Tirthak Patel, Aditya Ranjan, Harshitta Gandhi, William Cutler, Devesh Tiwari

Year

2023

Paper ID

54406

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

73

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Exploration into quantum machine learning has grown tremendously in recent years due to the ability of quantum computers to speed up classical programs. However, these efforts have yet to solve unsupervised similarity detection tasks due to the challenge of porting them to run on quantum computers. To overcome this challenge, we propose SLIQ, the first open-sourced work for resource-efficient quantum similarity detection networks, built with practical and effective quantum learning and variance-reducing algorithms.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Exploration into quantum machine learning has grown tremendously in recent years due to the ability of quantum computers to speed up classical programs.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #54406 #69596 Comprehensive pKa Data Augmenta... #69584 OQMD: Single-Qubit Rotation Con... #69549 REGRID-QAOA: A Resource-Efficie... #69539 Learning ground state observabl...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.