Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Measurement-based Lorentz-covariant Bohmian trajectories of interacting photons
arXiv
Authors: Joshua Foo, Austin P. Lund, Timothy C. Ralph
Year
2023
Paper ID
54364
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
167
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In a recent article [Foo et. al., Nature Comms. 13, 2 (2022)], we devised a method of constructing the Lorentz-covariant Bohmian trajectories of single photons via weak measurements of the photon's momentum and energy. However, whether such a framework can consistently describe multiparticle interactions remains to be seen. Here, we present a nontrivial generalisation of our framework to describe the relativistic Bohmian trajectories of two interacting photons exhibiting nonclassical interference due to their indistiguishability. We begin by deriving the average velocity fields of the indistinguishable photons using a conditional weak measurement protocol, with detectors that are agnostic to the identity of the respective photons. We demonstrate a direct correspondence between the operationally-derived trajectories with those obtained using a position- and time-symmetrised multiparticle Klein-Gordon wavefunction, whose dynamics are manifestly Lorentz-covariant. We propose a spacetime metric that depends nonlocally on the positions of both particles as a curvature based interpretation of the resulting trajectories. Contrary to prior expectations, our results demonstrate a consistent trajectory-based interpretation of relativistic multiparticle interactions in quantum theory.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In a recent article [Foo et.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.