Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation

Evolution of Quantum Resources in Quantum-walk-based Search Algorithm

arXiv
Authors: Meng Li, Xian Shi

Year

2023

Paper ID

54267

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

95

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Quantum walk is fundamental to designing many quantum algorithms. Here we consider the effects of quantum coherence and quantum entanglement for the quantum walk search on the complete bipartite graph. First, we numerically show the complementary relationship between the success probability and the two quantum resources (quantum coherence and quantum entanglement). We also provide theoretical analysis in the asymptotic scenarios. At last, we discuss the role played by generalized depolarizing noises and find that it would influence the dynamics of success probability and quantum coherence sharply, which is demonstrated by theoretical derivation and numerical simulation.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Quantum walk is fundamental to designing many quantum algorithms.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #54267 #69978 Distribution Complexity of Elec... #69974 Hierarchical separation of rela... #69964 Bounded-depth spacetime lattice... #69945 Phase Stable Integrated Delay L...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.